Top Hyperliquid traders
A Hyperliquid leaderboard, ranked by evidence.
Every wallet below cleared AlphaYou's evidence floors, then was ranked on nine signals rather than raw profit. “Best” means highest scoring in this qualified sample, not a prediction of your returns or a verified professional status.
Data snapshot: . Inspect sample coverage and download the data.
Filter the full listTop Hyperliquid traders by Mirror Score
57 qualified wallets
- Copy
- Score
- 9.35
- 30d P&L
- +$333.49K
- Worst dip
- 0.6%
- Account
- $1.22M
- Copy
- Score
- 9.12
- 30d P&L
- +$35.80K
- Worst dip
- 16.6%
- Account
- $118.19K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.94
- 30d P&L
- +$105.04K
- Worst dip
- 15.9%
- Account
- $546.09K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.88
- 30d P&L
- +$550.51K
- Worst dip
- 4.1%
- Account
- $576.34K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.72
- 30d P&L
- +$31.99K
- Worst dip
- 4.7%
- Account
- $156.43K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.70
- 30d P&L
- +$29.26K
- Worst dip
- 30.2%
- Account
- $188.31K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.64
- 30d P&L
- +$60.32K
- Worst dip
- 19.7%
- Account
- $505.95K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.58
- 30d P&L
- +$127.81K
- Worst dip
- 18.8%
- Account
- $244.09K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.53
- 30d P&L
- +$283.51K
- Worst dip
- 28.9%
- Account
- $1.08M
- Copy
- Score
- 8.49
- 30d P&L
- +$52.67K
- Worst dip
- 23.4%
- Account
- $115.89K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.38
- 30d P&L
- +$671.83K
- Worst dip
- 32.5%
- Account
- $7.60M
- Copy
- Score
- 8.35
- 30d P&L
- -$8.88K
- Worst dip
- 20.4%
- Account
- $224.59K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.33
- 30d P&L
- +$263.15K
- Worst dip
- 13.9%
- Account
- $198.70K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.31
- 30d P&L
- +$44.38K
- Worst dip
- 2.1%
- Account
- $366.77K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.23
- 30d P&L
- +$30.32K
- Worst dip
- 28.1%
- Account
- $304.96K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.23
- 30d P&L
- +$38.80K
- Worst dip
- 22.6%
- Account
- $115.42K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.15
- 30d P&L
- +$245.44K
- Worst dip
- 16.7%
- Account
- $1.07M
- Copy
- Score
- 8.13
- 30d P&L
- +$37.47K
- Worst dip
- 27.5%
- Account
- $164.50K
- Copy
- Score
- 8.02
- 30d P&L
- +$66.90K
- Worst dip
- 25.2%
- Account
- $1.24M
- Copy
- Score
- 8.00
- 30d P&L
- -$12.01K
- Worst dip
- 24.5%
- Account
- $164.42K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.97
- 30d P&L
- +$49.58K
- Worst dip
- 50.0%
- Account
- $285.26K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.97
- 30d P&L
- +$344.09K
- Worst dip
- 32.6%
- Account
- $934.37K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.96
- 30d P&L
- +$7.33K
- Worst dip
- 46.3%
- Account
- $119.58K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.92
- 30d P&L
- +$124.40K
- Worst dip
- 35.6%
- Account
- $670.58K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.91
- 30d P&L
- +$67.71K
- Worst dip
- 89.2%
- Account
- $197.70K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.90
- 30d P&L
- +$12.22K
- Worst dip
- 23.7%
- Account
- $807.46K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.87
- 30d P&L
- -$7.74K
- Worst dip
- 56.1%
- Account
- $7.04M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.86
- 30d P&L
- +$11.84K
- Worst dip
- 12.6%
- Account
- $245.81K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.85
- 30d P&L
- +$2.09M
- Worst dip
- 16.8%
- Account
- $3.97M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.76
- 30d P&L
- +$36.48K
- Worst dip
- 44.6%
- Account
- $486.71K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.75
- 30d P&L
- +$362.97K
- Worst dip
- 45.2%
- Account
- $6.56M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.74
- 30d P&L
- +$9.34K
- Worst dip
- 11.5%
- Account
- $114.18K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.72
- 30d P&L
- +$14.29K
- Worst dip
- 63.8%
- Account
- $194.40K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.71
- 30d P&L
- +$3.95K
- Worst dip
- 60.7%
- Account
- $309.58K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.70
- 30d P&L
- -$23.51K
- Worst dip
- 45.1%
- Account
- $113.27K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.69
- 30d P&L
- +$28.34K
- Worst dip
- 73.6%
- Account
- $134.57K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.68
- 30d P&L
- +$28.19K
- Worst dip
- 18.9%
- Account
- $264.89K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.65
- 30d P&L
- +$55.56K
- Worst dip
- 27.8%
- Account
- $118.20K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.57
- 30d P&L
- -$65.41K
- Worst dip
- 35.9%
- Account
- $829.66K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.49
- 30d P&L
- +$8.94K
- Worst dip
- 59.6%
- Account
- $379.07K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.46
- 30d P&L
- +$137.17K
- Worst dip
- 103.0%
- Account
- $344.41K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.40
- 30d P&L
- +$640.61K
- Worst dip
- 14.4%
- Account
- $408.65K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.37
- 30d P&L
- +$43.75K
- Worst dip
- 46.5%
- Account
- $259.94K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.37
- 30d P&L
- +$5.66K
- Worst dip
- 26.6%
- Account
- $125.75K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.32
- 30d P&L
- +$4.84K
- Worst dip
- 25.3%
- Account
- $336.08K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.31
- 30d P&L
- -$15.39K
- Worst dip
- 19.9%
- Account
- $587.10K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.30
- 30d P&L
- -$46.46K
- Worst dip
- 34.1%
- Account
- $1.41M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.27
- 30d P&L
- +$9.99M
- Worst dip
- 87.4%
- Account
- $10.68M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.24
- 30d P&L
- -$948.76
- Worst dip
- 76.8%
- Account
- $687.21K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.23
- 30d P&L
- -$1.98M
- Worst dip
- 27.9%
- Account
- $11.64M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.23
- 30d P&L
- +$80.90K
- Worst dip
- 32.9%
- Account
- $2.53M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.23
- 30d P&L
- +$15.51M
- Worst dip
- 60.8%
- Account
- $115.43M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.23
- 30d P&L
- -$25.51K
- Worst dip
- 72.0%
- Account
- $2.75M
- Copy
- Score
- 7.18
- 30d P&L
- +$66.17K
- Worst dip
- 52.4%
- Account
- $117.49K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.16
- 30d P&L
- +$75.49K
- Worst dip
- 37.8%
- Account
- $431.59K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.07
- 30d P&L
- -$49.98K
- Worst dip
- 41.7%
- Account
- $531.12K
- Copy
- Score
- 7.04
- 30d P&L
- -$16.60K
- Worst dip
- 33.6%
- Account
- $240.41K
Copyability research snapshot
What the top qualified Hyperliquid wallets look like today
In the October 21, 2026 snapshot of 57 qualified wallets with open positions, the median Mirror Score is 7.85 out of 10, the median all-time sampled worst dip is 28.9%, and 78.9% of wallets with 30-day data are profitable over that period.
Snapshot date
Sample definition: up to 100 wallets from the current qualified ranking that also have an open position. Percentages use only wallets with that metric available.
Download the current CSVRead the September Copyability Index- Median Mirror Score
- 7.85
- out of 10
- Median worst dip
- 28.9%
- 28.1% are below 20%
- Median observed history
- 244 days
- 28.1% have at least one year
- Positive last 30 days
- 78.9%
- 45 of 57 measured wallets
- Strong 90-day consistency
- 35.1%
- R² at or above 0.65
- Median open positions
- 8.0
- current position snapshot
What this measures
Public wallet performance, sampled drawdown, record length, recent consistency and current position count among wallets that pass the published qualification rules.
What this excludes
Inactive and unqualified wallets are outside this snapshot. It describes the ranked sample and is not an estimate of every trader on Hyperliquid.
Copyability limit
These are screening signals, not a follower execution study. The data does not measure fill latency, slippage, partial fills or whether another account could reproduce the result.
What “best” means on this page
Total profit and a percentage return answer different questions. Profit in dollars can be large because the account is large; a percentage return needs a defined period and treatment of cash flows. Neither number alone describes drawdown, current exposure or the fills another account could obtain.
This ranking uses the Mirror Score instead. It combines nine signals, and maximum observed drawdown carries the largest single weight, so a trader who reached the same profit through a calmer equity curve outranks one who reached it through a violent one. Consistency, momentum, annual return, risk-adjusted return, profit capacity and trading efficiency make up the rest. Every weight, evidence floor and known limitation is published in the selection methodology.
Qualification and display use different time windows. A sampled drawdown of 60% or more within the trailing 12 months disqualifies a wallet. The Worst dip column shows the all-time sampled figure, so a trader can remain qualified while displaying an older drawdown above 60%. Neither measure necessarily captures every intraday move.
Read the record before you copy anyone
A high score is a reason to look closer, not a reason to skip the work. Open the profile and check how concentrated the current book is, how much leverage is in use, how long the record actually runs and how the worst dip compares to the peak profit. A profitable market maker or very fast trader can still be a poor copy target, because a follower may never reproduce the same entry, exit or fill quality.
Then decide how exposure should begin. Full-book mode moves you toward the trader's current portfolio, including positions opened earlier at prices you will not get. Forward-only mode waits for their next action instead. The trade-off between the two is covered in the copy trading guide.
To investigate a specific market, open the traders by market directory. To match an address from Hyperdash or another leaderboard, use the wallet tracker. Keep the same dates and instrument scope when comparing the result; a wallet's total return is not its return on one coin.
A ranking is not a recommendation
Historical performance does not guarantee future results. Position in this list describes a public record that already happened. A trader can change style, increase leverage or lose money, and a copier can see different results because of lag, slippage, fees and account size. AlphaYou provides evidence and controls, not investment advice or a promise of profit.
Frequently asked questions
How is this Hyperliquid leaderboard different from Hyperliquid's own?
Hyperliquid's own leaderboard ranks wallets by profit (30-day PNL when we checked), next to account value, ROI and volume. This is AlphaYou's own ranking, not Hyperliquid's. It ranks by Mirror Score, so all else equal a wallet that reached the same profit through a calmer equity curve ranks above one that reached it through a violent one. Every wallet here also cleared the evidence floors first: more than $100K in perpetuals account value, more than $20K in perpetuals profit, at least 90 days of usable history and at least 12 completed weeks.
Who are the best Hyperliquid traders to copy right now?
The ranking lists qualified Hyperliquid traders in Mirror Score order. A wallet needs more than $100K in perpetuals account value, more than $20K in perpetuals profit, at least 90 days of usable history and at least 12 completed weeks. A sampled drawdown of 60% or more within the trailing 12 months disqualifies it. The table still shows its all-time sampled worst dip.
What should I look for in a Hyperliquid copy trading app?
Check four things: whether trader selection is published rather than reduced to a leaderboard of raw profit, whether the app can take custody of your funds, whether you can set portfolio-level take-profit and stop-loss boundaries before you approve anything, and whether the fees are stated up front. AlphaYou publishes its full score methodology, uses trading permission without withdrawal permission, supports strategy-level TP and SL, and lists its builder fees on the fees page.
How do I copy a pro trader on Hyperliquid?
Open a trader's profile from the ranking below and review their record, then choose an allocation and decide whether to start in full-book mode, which moves you toward their current portfolio, or forward-only mode, which waits for their next action. Set any take-profit or stop-loss boundary you want, then approve the strategy from your own wallet.
Can I copy trade on Hyperliquid 24/7?
Hyperliquid's perpetual markets run continuously rather than on exchange opening hours, and AlphaYou follows a selected trader's actions automatically once a strategy is running, so you do not need to be at a screen for a copy to happen. Continuous execution is not a guarantee of a fill: fast markets, slippage, partial fills and minimum order sizes still apply.
Why can this ranking differ from a Hyperdash leaderboard?
Match the wallet address, reporting window, included positions and update time first. This list is a qualified sample ranked by AlphaYou's Mirror Score. A different platform can rank a different pool or use another score. Equal-looking ranks or scores do not establish equal methods or risk.
Does this leaderboard include every Hyperliquid wallet?
No. The displayed leaderboard and downloadable copyability snapshot use the same sample of up to 100 qualified wallets with open positions from AlphaYou's tracked feed. Neither is a network-wide count, and an absent address is not proof that a wallet is unprofitable or unsafe.
Does a top ranking mean a trader will keep winning?
No. The Mirror Score organises public evidence that already exists, it does not predict anything. A trader who ranks highly can change style, increase leverage or lose money, and a copier can see different results because of lag, slippage, fees and account size.